| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
159
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 02:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
Empty clones and keeping isk on an alt account.
Next suggestion? |

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
159
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 04:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
xarjin wrote:"Both so wrong"
How is it "wrong" to openly discuss game design potential that could offer permanent highsec dwellers a level playing field with nullsec alliances.
"but you'll never listen to anything anybody says because it doesn't suit you."
what doesn't suit me is that the silent majority of eve players have become accustomed to pvp game mechanics imbalance that offers preference to nullsec alliances that have no repercussions for undertaking what really amounts to military conquest of high sec npc alliance controlled space.
If you have anything to add feel free to offer something constructive other than the usual rhyme everyone in eve seems to have in the last 8 years that it's fine and "it's eve" which does nothing to address evolution of new game design potential.
npc dwellers have no other choice but to enjoy the side effects of nullsec conquest and most could not do anything to offer challenge in return hence the imbalance of game mechanics
Now if npc corp members could participate in sov warfare that would indeed be an interesting "evolution" to the game's mechanics. While we do have faction warfare that has really done nothing to address these long standing issues.
"You realise you look like entitled brats who stamp their little feet when their balloon pops."
I realise your likely a director of a nullsec alliance that feels entitled to roam highsec and do what pleases you with little repercussions. if I were to fly out to your alliance controlled space and start what would most likely be a short rampage of destruction feeling entitled to do so it wouldn't be met with a free pass to leave with my assets.
What point are you actually trying to make here?
|

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
159
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 14:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Honnete Du Decimer wrote:Andski wrote:Why should gankers be punished beyond ship loss through game mechanics? When 5M ISK ships can kill 200M ISK ships.
Wow. If you want to make EVE 'fair', why on earth would you want to make it impossible for a cheap ship to kill a more expensive one?
There are PLENTY of ways to avoid getting ganked. It isn't the fault of game mechanics that you people just aren't using them. |

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
160
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 19:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
Kelly Kavanagh wrote:This most definitely is a problem but, I prefer to address problems with the most immersive solutions. So what would we do in real life?
Escorts! The least NPC corps can do for their 11% tax is provide you with a faction navy escort. The size and capabilities of your escorts should depend directly on your standing with the faction, all the way down to -9, and inversely on the security level of the system you're in, all the way out to 0.1 systems. If you commit an offense, you get attacked by your victims escorts as well as your own.
What happens when you die? What do your escorts do?
And what happens when we kill them too? |

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
161
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 21:39:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kelly Kavanagh wrote: I respawn in station, buy another ship, and undock with a new escort. My last escort fights you until they die or destroy your ship. If you're still there, then you face an increasing number of both navy and CONCORD ships until your ship pops.
Any more stupid questions, either of you?
Oh, yeah. Clearly what we need is infinite amounts of navy on top of the concord we already get.
What if you get killed legally? Can flipped or something? Your escorts just sit around, yeah?
You need to LEARN HOW THE GAME WORKS.
And also post with your main. |

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
167
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 03:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
Amaroq Dricaldari wrote:I support this idea, and that is FINAL. It would help the rookie population significantly, but you are all too lazy to think about it.
I dunno about the others, but there are a number of topics I think are good, or that I point out ways to improve.
Then there are the overwhelming majority that consist of little more than poorly thought out whines and gamebreaking nonsense. Guess where 'lol maek highsec into invulnerablesec but don't touch the rewards' fits in? |
| |
|